Not sure if I really need to read this, but Joan Acocella's review in the New Yorker was so irritating that I feel I ought to so that I can at least hypothetically form a rebuttal.
The short answer is: carbs. Chances are, you can learn what you want to know by just reading the highest-rated Amazon.com reviews. Most of this book is just setting up straw men about an oversimplified calories-in-calories-out model and then destroying them. It also spends way too much time making the argument for eating meat, and is a little ridiculously skeptical about the health (as opposed to fat-losing) benefits of exercise. OTOH, it's a pretty engaging thing to listen to on a 10-hour road trip.
Pretty uneven; some stories are pretty great, others are pretty bad. Generally pretty imaginative too, and all but one story (the last and eponymous) were compelling enough that I wanted to see how they ended. The one that sticks with me the most is the first, a Hugo-award-winner called “The Erdmann Nexus”.
Via http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/23/magazine/neil-young-comes-clean.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss
A little over-simplistic and narrowly focused for me, with far too much personal editorializing about the author's goats, etc., but still provides some interesting observations on outdoor medical marijuana growing in Mendocino. Might be more persuasive for folks who are more ambivalent/less informed about medical marijuana, cannabis legalization, and ending the drug war.
This book is sort of Pynchon-esque. A lot of it feels like it's describing some interesting art projects.
It's also really confusing how LeBov's name is so similar to Labov, the sociolinguist.
It's amazing, but a real bummer through much of it.
I feel like someone (European) has overestimated their abilities to reason and understand the world.
And what would Empire have to say about your use of Wade-Giles romanization?
Actually surprisingly full of good ideas, especially with techniques (e.g., cryo-blanching; pre-hydrating pasta before cooking) and some interesting ingredient/flavor combinations (popcorn-white chocolate gelato). I only skimmed through the last section for professionals, because as a home cook, I'm definitely too lazy to go out and find transglutaminase or measure out ratios of kappa carrageenan to locust bean gum.
I appreciated the scientific explanations of what's going on at a cellular/molecular level when you're cooking.
The writing is distractingly bad, unfortunately.
An interesting, fast read, although it left a couple of major areas un-addressed. In particular, I think there's a lot more to discuss about why the Internet does not generate so much revenue. Cowen basically states this as an inevitability due to the nature of the Internet, but I don't see why it's not a matter of the market hasn't rationalized it yet. Cowen also has kind of a cartoonish view of bureaucracy, with no consideration for the many good reasons the administrative state exists. I think the basic analytic framework is pretty interesting (we've plucked all the “low-hanging fruit,” ranging from the Industrial Revolution to communications technology, and gotten accustomed to a rate of economic growth associated with those innovations), though I'd be interested in reading how historians of science have responded.
Some really interesting ideas about society embedded in here, but I totally could not relate to the first person plural narrator. Basically all of the relationships involved are unconvincing. Prose style was also pretty weak.
The main character is both very realistic and very unrealistic at the same time, but I think that's intentional. It's hard to believe, for example, that Nate could be so perceptive in some ways yet so dumb in other ways, but that's pretty much how it goes with the human condition.
I liked the concept (gimmick?) and was happy to read it right after finishing The Love Affairs, but was quite disappointed that the voice sounded so much like Nate's.
Didn't get a lot out of it; too lightweight and insubstantial, although I agree with basically all of it.
The biggest problem with this book is that the main character is a jerk.
Also, I posit that this book has the most frequent usage of the word “maculated” in any novel written in the 20th century.
In the event that I ever get my fantasy career as a literary critic off the ground, I'm calling dibs on comparing this book and Piketty's Capital.
This is another book that's billed as a thriller but isn't really a thriller. It's a fine family drama and explores some really important and interesting issues, but not what I was expecting. To the extent that trigger warnings are useful, it should maybe come with a trigger warning for child abuse.
I no longer need to write the great Chinese-American-millennial novel because Jenny Zhang would probably do it better than me. There's a lot in here that makes me suspicious that she has some kind of secret access to my mind/memory. But I knew this collection was perfectly true to me by page 13, when she writes: “I was born itchy as all hell and I would die itchy as all hell unless a crafty genius somewhere decided to invent a miracle drug that would save me from this long and itchy life.”
“Paddle to Canada” by Heather Monley is wonderful, and poses the eternal question: If it's a paddleboat, is it a rope or a line?
As a collection of essays, it's somewhat uneven, but mostly worthwhile. There are some interesting ideas in here I hadn't previously been exposed to, particularly in providing details about how the Anti-Apartheid Movement played out, and perspectives on BDS (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions) against Israel and the Gulf Labor efforts targeting the Guggenheim. There was one supremely bad take on free speech and “censorship” that is an embarrassment to the rest of the volume. If you're interested in boycott and divestment as tactics, or if you're a “cultural producer” interested in the artist's role in politics, it's worth checking out.
Some of the older material hasn't aged well, but the newer additions make for a satisfying conclusion. I'm persuaded.
A good look at various factors affected by the growth of utility scale solar energy, particularly in the context of biodiversity/ecosystem effects and lifecycle assessment, especially as applied to thin film vs. crystalline silicon technologies. Also provides a good synopsis of ARRA investments in solar and a more macro view of the global PV market in the past decade or so. Overall, very interesting and informative. I do wish there was more about distributed and rooftop solar and grid/transmission/distribution. (And at least in the edition I read, there was an unacceptable number of copy and other editing errors.)
It's more like reading a lot of solutions to word problems than like reading a novel. I think you can probably watch the movie instead of reading the book.
Interesting and page-turningly compelling, like LOST, but at times reads like a tedious recounting of a psychedelic trip.