In a House of Lies

WHAT'S IN A HOUSE OF LIES ABOUT?

A decade and change ago, a private investigator went missing. John Rebus was part of the team that spent weeks looking for him—interviewing his client, his family, his boyfriend, the target of his current investigation, and everyone else they could think of. At least that's what the paperwork said. There's some question about that—and the family of Stuart Bloom has forced more than one investigation into the original search.

Now his body is discovered—in an area that had been well-searched originally. There's reason to believe that the body had been somewhere else for years. Now the police—a team featuring DI Siobhan Clarke—have to decide where it was as well as who killed him. This involves taking a fresh look at the old case as well as a new investigation. The original detectives (those who are still alive, that is) and some of the uniformed officers are brought in for questioning—which means that Rebus is under the microscope once again. This suits him fine—it's a chance for him to have a part in closing the case once and for all (at least in his mind)

Meanwhile, Malcolm Fox's boss assigns him to take one final look at the original investigation—given the new discovery, can they find police misconduct at the root?

Also, Clarke's being harassed by someone—only crank calls and vandalism, so far. She doesn't want to do anything official about it, so she asks Rebus to look into things—if nothing else, it might keep him out of her hair while she looks for Bloom's killer. Might.

There's a lot to untangle in these pages, thankfully, Rankin's three detectives are on the cases.

WHAT DID I THINK ABOUT IN A HOUSE OF LIES?

This post feels entirely too short. I'm struggling here. What do I say about Rankin or Rebus (or Clarke or Fox) that I haven't already said? I'm willing to believe that I've asked this question when discussing at least 3 previous books. I'm sorely tempted to just post something like: "Ian Rankin wrote a book about John Rebus. You know what to do."

I was particularly impressed at the way Rankin got the band (on both sides of the law) back together here—for the reader, it's expected—probably even inevitable. But it comes across as organic and unforced. Between Rebus' retirement, and the divergent paths that the others' careers have taken, that's no mean feat. Unlike, say, Renée Ballard, Siobhan Clarke isn't soldiering on with those she can't trust. Ballard has to get Bosch involved, Clarke chooses to ask for his help and/or lets him push his way in.

Solid mysteries, expertly plotted and executed, full of characters (new and old) that you believe and get invested in. In a House of Lies feels as fresh and as compelling as Knots and Crosses.