Origin

Ugh. I read The Da Vinci Code years ago and enjoyed it immensely: the fast pace, tight plotting and clever marriage of the thriller genre with conspiracy theory made it a compelling read. Of course, the characterisation and dialogue and writing were awful, but it was a great page-turner.

This one was just dreadful. The writing was worse than I remember. Every single noun comes with a primary school adjective (for example - not actually from the book! - “the pretty lady watched the tall man walk down the dark corridor”) until you're going tum-te-tum-te-tum in your head and start losing your mind. Buildings are “massive”, cliffs are always “sheer” and there are no libraries or houses or shelves that contain books, just “tomes”.

I probably noticed this more because the plot is a lot thinner, there is very little symbology for Langdon (and his “eidetic memory”) to interpret and I worked out the ‘twist' quite early on.

I did enjoy the fact that the book is very up to date, referencing some modern cultural debates (Catholic crimes, the rise of the New Atheists, creationism vs evolution, existential threats, AI), but since these were represented without any kind of nuance - more storybook simplifications - this wasn't enough to drag my review beyond 2 stars.