The Afghan Campaign

The Afghan Campaign

2006 • 351 pages

Ratings3

Average rating2.7

15

I tried for over roughly two weeks to get into this book. It kept frustrating me and I would put it down. It gets one star from me only because I could only make it 73 pages in before I gave up; it is entirely possible It could have gotten better/I could have gotten used to it with more time.

But there's a lot to read, and if something is this hard for me to give a chance, it shouldn't deserve my attention.

The main thing that irritates me about this book, I guess, is that unlike most historical fiction, it doesn't transport you to the place and time it's supposed to. It doesn't FEEL like you're in the mind of an Ancient Greek, it doesn't FEEL like you are in ancient Afghanistan. It feels modern. I think that this is intentional, a theme by the writer to say something akin to “war is the same no matter when it takes place” but for me it falls flat. The nicknames of the soldiers grates on me too- I realize soldiers probably had nicknames, but these ones feel so modern that it is almost as if the author used them so he didn't have to use any Greek names (he uses “Macks” instead of Macedonians as well).

The use of the words “dames” at all, let alone during serious moments, is jarring and takes you out of the time and place. I also don't think some of the cultural aspects of the Afghans that they are describing would have been around yet, I believe he is describing parts of Islam, nearly a thousand years before it crops up.

And there are no historical characters in this, just mentioned. At least so far. That is not inherently a bad thing, but having familiar characters even in supporting roles help put the story in perspective and make it easier to invest.

This might not be a bad book. I'm not sure. But it's not for me.

November 15, 2017Report this review