The Historian

3/5. This book was way too long for what it wanted to do. A lot of plot developments in it was pretty unbelievable as well. I will just say that the book did make me want to keep on reading though - up to a point. There was a good amount of suspense, but also just too much description of landscape and nature scenery. The whole mystery and hunt for Dracula was definitely my favourite part of the book, it unfolded almost painfully slowly but it was so atmospheric that I didn't quite mind that.

It often felt like Kostova was mainly interested in writing a sort of history/travel literature piece about the Eastern Europe to Turkey region, but with some Dracula flavour to it to... give it some mass appeal? Unfortunately, I didn't really quite appreciate a lot of the Eastern European bits of the book, simply because it isn't a region I'm familiar with.

I also couldn't really get behind a lot of the character decisions, particularly the two main romances in the book. Paul and Helen's romance I already found a bit contrived because they had nothing in common besides being colleagues on the same academic journey, but what I really couldn't understand was the narrator's romance with Bartley. It felt completely random? I can understand if, as teenagers, they decided to sleep together or have a fling because they were just thrown together for a while and found each other attractive. But by all accounts they seem to have actually developed a romance despite their rather short relationship. I didn't understand why the protagonist's name had to be kept secret. Literally every other character in the book is named, and plus the narrator isn't even an important part of the story at all! It just felt like a meaningless and unnecessary gimmick. Ending spoilers: I didn't understand why Helen decided to abandon Paul and their baby daughter so suddenly and dramatically out of nowhere just to go hunt for Dracula. It again felt really unnecessary. Even if she decided she had to leave, couldn't she at least write to them telling them what she needs to do and why she needs to be away from them, and just keep her location a secret? Unless she doesn't trust Paul to do the right thing and abandon their daughter to search for her. I didn't even get why Dracula had to kidnap Rossi of all people. Rossi himself raised a good objection. Dracula says Rossi was the first scholar to find him, but Rossi's like, uh no I didn't, you brought me here. and Dracula's like, yeaaah details. His reasoning is that Rossi decided to try investigating him a second time but... I don't believe Rossi's the only scholar who reopened the investigation into Dracula a mere second time through like 500 years. Scholars are notoriously curious people! So it all just felt like a gimmick to get Paul and Helen on their epic journey too.

Anyway... I'm glad I finished it. If this book was more focused on one thing - either the hunt for Dracula or history/travel literature - I feel like it'd have been much more successful in finding its audience.