Reading Literature in a Men's Prison
Ratings1
Average rating3
The idea behind the book club and hearing stories about each of the men who participated are what qualify this book to receive two stars, in my opinion.
However, the author, despite having a PH.D. and years of teaching experience, is the absolute wrong person to be running a book club for prisoners.
A good leader Mikita Brottman is not, not just for being completely unaware (and unwilling to learn) about the conditions in which her book club members live, waiting nearly 3 years to tour the prison.
Her selections are outrageously insensitive; every selection is about being imprisoned literally or figuratively from “On the Yard” to “The Metamorphosis” to “Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.” Sure, have a selection or two with that theme, but one after the other? A good leader would switch up the themes or types of selections.
A good leader would understand that each member relates to the material differently and certainly from personal frames of reference. Some of the book club members weren't voracious readers, but bravely took up each challenge.
A good leader wouldn't expect other book club members to struggle with material that the leader disliked at first and/or also struggles with. Hitting the group with “Heart of Darkness” right out of the gate is crazy; despite being short, it's densely packed and rather difficult.
A good leader from outside the prison would understand that there are boundaries that must be set and maintained, particularly as a psychoanalyst. Ms. Brottman spends some time talking about how she objectifies the men's bodies and projects certain expectations on them, then expects the men to conform to her wishes. How about maintaining boundaries after the prisoners have completed their sentences?!?
A good leader would not act put upon because she cannot bring her dog to prison.
A good leader would not expect a book club to change members' lives when part of the appeal is that the club is lead by a woman and another part is trying something different. The author ends the book feeling sorry for herself and whining that all she has is literature.