Ubik

This book employs a literary technique that annoys me. I believe the proper term for it is ‘unreliable witness.' It is frustrating to read a story, and eventually learn that the narrator / author has been lying to the reader about what is real. About the only redeeming part of this book, in my opinion, was the imagination shown by the author, writing in 1969 - and imagining how things would change by 1992.