Really enjoyed this. Was worried I wouldn't, because of the slivers of 2016 meme humour-- but I am pleased to say they didn't bother me after a while. Muir is very talented and writes some great, sharp sentences, and this is a very well-deployed first book in a series, that still tells a complete story while leaving questions and plot threads echoing around in your head. Putting the sequel on hold now.
Really enjoyed this. Was worried I wouldn't, because of the slivers of 2016 meme humour-- but I am pleased to say they didn't bother me after a while. Muir is very talented and writes some great, sharp sentences, and this is a very well-deployed first book in a series, that still tells a complete story while leaving questions and plot threads echoing around in your head. Putting the sequel on hold now.
This is great-- good prose and a fully-realized world. Not 100% up my personal alley (not really a boat/pirate gal) but I respect the hell out of this.
I did find that it felt incomplete in the way of a "first book that's already intended to be part of a trilogy". I like it better when the first book feels complete and a sequel expands on it. I also had a hard time with the characters, a lot of them blurred together for me. But still, the world here is so great that my takeaway is "wow". It's not all the time you read a fantasy that feels this distinct.
I also like the small, thoughtful touches towards gender equality, sexuality, etc.- both logical for the world and also, I'm just glad to not be reading my 15,000th generically sexist fantasy universe.
This is great-- good prose and a fully-realized world. Not 100% up my personal alley (not really a boat/pirate gal) but I respect the hell out of this.
I did find that it felt incomplete in the way of a "first book that's already intended to be part of a trilogy". I like it better when the first book feels complete and a sequel expands on it. I also had a hard time with the characters, a lot of them blurred together for me. But still, the world here is so great that my takeaway is "wow". It's not all the time you read a fantasy that feels this distinct.
I also like the small, thoughtful touches towards gender equality, sexuality, etc.- both logical for the world and also, I'm just glad to not be reading my 15,000th generically sexist fantasy universe.
Undoubtedly charming, but suffers under the weight of its genre obligations. Also, I just don’t buy this male character. I think it’s too much laid on too thick that he’s loved her from afar for years (semi-openly!), that he’s emotionally repressed but also incredibly emotionally articulate… tips too far over the edge of disbelief for me. At one point she’s like “I expected him to be mean to me!” But he literally barely has ever even been rude to you. It’s tough to make a character difficult enough to facilitate the narrative while also not a total asshole you want dead, and you can really feel Henry struggling with where to draw that line. Also I think it’s always so funny when a book like this ends with a stapled-on final chapter reassuring you that they got engaged. Like, true love— not quite enough! Readers need to know they made it legal, apparently. Anyways my favourite line in the whole thing was when she said her best friend “screams whenever she turns left”. Soo fucking real and such a tight, funny, vivid character moment— I wanted more like that and less “I’m the sexiest and most in touch with my feelings guy ever 😇 except when I’m not 👿”.
Undoubtedly charming, but suffers under the weight of its genre obligations. Also, I just don’t buy this male character. I think it’s too much laid on too thick that he’s loved her from afar for years (semi-openly!), that he’s emotionally repressed but also incredibly emotionally articulate… tips too far over the edge of disbelief for me. At one point she’s like “I expected him to be mean to me!” But he literally barely has ever even been rude to you. It’s tough to make a character difficult enough to facilitate the narrative while also not a total asshole you want dead, and you can really feel Henry struggling with where to draw that line. Also I think it’s always so funny when a book like this ends with a stapled-on final chapter reassuring you that they got engaged. Like, true love— not quite enough! Readers need to know they made it legal, apparently. Anyways my favourite line in the whole thing was when she said her best friend “screams whenever she turns left”. Soo fucking real and such a tight, funny, vivid character moment— I wanted more like that and less “I’m the sexiest and most in touch with my feelings guy ever 😇 except when I’m not 👿”.
Something I reallyyyyy love about McKillip is her vibe-based magic. There's no meticulous description of how it all works; she just trusts that it feels right, and it does. Dream logic. I love the sensuality and instinctiveness of it. And the moment in this when Kane first addresses her daughter is SO good.
Something I reallyyyyy love about McKillip is her vibe-based magic. There's no meticulous description of how it all works; she just trusts that it feels right, and it does. Dream logic. I love the sensuality and instinctiveness of it. And the moment in this when Kane first addresses her daughter is SO good.
The Wizard Knight
Can't get myself to finish this one! Will try again in the future cuz I love Gene.
Can't get myself to finish this one! Will try again in the future cuz I love Gene.
From what I've heard about Sanderson-- namely that his prose is thin and inelegant-- I didn't expect to like this. And I didn't! I might have powered through if it wasn't 700 pages long. My God. Say less.
From what I've heard about Sanderson-- namely that his prose is thin and inelegant-- I didn't expect to like this. And I didn't! I might have powered through if it wasn't 700 pages long. My God. Say less.
Didn't really enjoy this. Two things that stood out:
Didn't really enjoy this. Two things that stood out:
I'd like to read this again, because there's a lot here to like but I just didn't really click with it. I enjoyed her later work more. The dialogue here is a little heavy-handed and stilted; and although I like that the second book focuses on the women, it's a lil frustrating that it basically retreads the first. But it feels weird to complain about such a great author bc I know the next fantasy I read is probably not going to be at her level.
Also the repetitive names drove me a little nuts. Morgon, Morgol, Hel, Hed-- enuf!!
I'd like to read this again, because there's a lot here to like but I just didn't really click with it. I enjoyed her later work more. The dialogue here is a little heavy-handed and stilted; and although I like that the second book focuses on the women, it's a lil frustrating that it basically retreads the first. But it feels weird to complain about such a great author bc I know the next fantasy I read is probably not going to be at her level.
Also the repetitive names drove me a little nuts. Morgon, Morgol, Hel, Hed-- enuf!!
I read this in one day, so, there's that! Definitely better than The Maidens, but not better written or more interesting, just slightly less stupid. Michaelides has a lot of really interesting nuggets of ideas but either won't or can't execute them effectively. He is also allergic to subtlety. The twist IS a cool idea but it was cooler when Agatha Christie did it like 100 years ago.
I was also amused/frustrated that he makes such a big fuss over what a fascinating and unique person Alicia is, only for her POV chapters to be SOOOOOOOOOO banal. Slightly bitchy at worst. I started Eileen by Ottessa Moshfegh today, too-- now that is a gnarly fucking book unafraid to get real weird with it. And I'm on, like, page 30. Anyways. I do give props to the author for writing a real page-turner because that's a skill. But having read two of his books now it's clear that all he can do is write the exact same thing over again. Shut up about Greece and weed, my God.
Also I'm pissed because Michaelides overuses the em dash so hard that he makes ME self-conscious about MY overuse. I literally deleted an em dash from this review. 😤
I read this in one day, so, there's that! Definitely better than The Maidens, but not better written or more interesting, just slightly less stupid. Michaelides has a lot of really interesting nuggets of ideas but either won't or can't execute them effectively. He is also allergic to subtlety. The twist IS a cool idea but it was cooler when Agatha Christie did it like 100 years ago.
I was also amused/frustrated that he makes such a big fuss over what a fascinating and unique person Alicia is, only for her POV chapters to be SOOOOOOOOOO banal. Slightly bitchy at worst. I started Eileen by Ottessa Moshfegh today, too-- now that is a gnarly fucking book unafraid to get real weird with it. And I'm on, like, page 30. Anyways. I do give props to the author for writing a real page-turner because that's a skill. But having read two of his books now it's clear that all he can do is write the exact same thing over again. Shut up about Greece and weed, my God.
Also I'm pissed because Michaelides overuses the em dash so hard that he makes ME self-conscious about MY overuse. I literally deleted an em dash from this review. 😤