Nick
Transmuted
I know I’m not the target audience, but I thoroughly enjoyed this story.
It had everything I could possibly want: black humor, body horror, Lovecraftian darkness, shame, guilt, love, sex, death…
One of my favorite things was how chronically online the main character was. That cracked me up so much.
I know I’m not the target audience, but I thoroughly enjoyed this story.
It had everything I could possibly want: black humor, body horror, Lovecraftian darkness, shame, guilt, love, sex, death…
One of my favorite things was how chronically online the main character was. That cracked me up so much.
This book wasn’t exceptionally bad, but I find myself struggling to come up with a single positive
This book wasn’t exceptionally bad, but I find myself struggling to come up with a single positive
This book was bad. Like really bad. Like, The Room bad. Giving it a 2 instead of a 1 because it was so bad that it was entertaining.
Before I dive into the actual book, let's start with the author. David Bell, according to the bio blurb, has an MA in creative writing, a PhD in American literature and creative writing, and is currently an English professor. OK, good credentials... We'll revisit them shortly.
The premise here is that six students are vying for an academic scholarship. This is no ordinary scholarship, mind you. It is the most prestigious scholarship for the school with the caveat being total secrecy and seclusion during the selection process. The reason? Rich people can do whatever they want. Because of this, the author is able to get six students, the vice president, and the wealthy Hyde family's sole heir and donor into a locked room mystery.
If these seems convoluted, bear with me, because it get a whole lot worse. See: part of this selection process involves every single person in the house having to give up their phones and other personal affects until the end of the process. This is enforced by the head of campus police as stated by the Hyde family's bylaws. Maybe now is a good time to mention that these bylaws can be changed once a year, so essentially the rules get changed as is convenient. Waiting staff is allowed into the house before the games begin, and no one is allowed in or out until the end, lest the entire scholarship is dissolved. Ah, so the stakes are high...I guess. And for some reason they're so high that there are no contingency measures for emergencies. Makes sense for a measly scholarship. Oh, and there are protests happening because dad gum liberals or whatever.
So, who is dumb enough to partake in this, you ask? We'll I'd love to tell you!
1) Milo - The Front Runner - This guy has it all! He's smart, everyone likes him, he's got a great personality, but everyone in this room has a jealousy problem with him. Whoa, hope nothing bad happens to him!
2) Natalia - The Brain - She's as smart as Milo, but she's undocumented. Ooooooooh.
3) James - The Rule Follower - He's not just a "rule follower." He's an old military guy. Not a single emotion in this guy, just logic. Real Data from Star Trek type stuff.
4) Sydney - The Athlete - Maybe not as smart as the others, but she really can play volleyball. Has some skeletons in her closet...but who doesn't, amirite?
5) Duffy - The Cowboy - Starts off with a cowboy hat, ends up just being a guy.
6) Emily - The Social Justice Warrior - All of these are directly from the back of the book. Someone actually wrote that down, not me. Yeah, she's a rude dude with a 'tude, but her intentions are good, I hope.
7) Vice President Troy Gaines - The university's go-between for the students and the Hyde family. He wants to keep both sides happy because he's just that good of a guy.
8) Nicholas Hyde - The sole heir to the Hyde Family fortune, this guy is a dickhead...or is he?
Every single one of these characters fucking sucked. They're all terrible, terrible caricatures written by a guy who's never ran into a single smart person, undocumented student and/or Latina, soldier and/or black person, athlete, cowboy, social justice warrior, or rich person in his life. Every single one of these doofuses is the direct reflection of how someone like the Vice Principal would see them. Going back to the author's role in academia: wow, who could've seen that coming? The vice principal's actions are hilariously dumb. He has no street smarts, barely any book smarts, and can't do simple things like opening a window or door.
From the moment the door locks, the plot points and mysteries just pile up like a huge stack of triceratops poo filled with sick. So, the college is simultaneously dirt poor but also extremely expensive and prestigious? The Hyde Family is soooooo rich that they can just pay for bazillions of dollars for students and their businesses but can't afford simple fixes on the one thing that keeps them in the public eye? Puh-lease. This book is just teeming with shit like this. It never gets better, only worse. Nobody makes any decisions that make sense whether or not you see the people as real characters or dumb stereotypes. They just kind of float through the book without direction, even Mr Logic. And then the book ends.
It's really hard to point out how ridiculous all of this is without giving spoilers, so yeah, I can't give this 1 star because I do think people should read it. Unlike most mysteries that will make you wonder what's going to happen next or who is responsible, you'll most likely be laughing and scratching your head.
And then the cherry on top? I don't know if it was the author or the publisher's doing, but there is a fucking Book Club Discussion at the end of this? Like, what the fuuuuuuuuuuck? Who needs to discuss this god damn book that was written by and adult for adults that reads like YA drivel? I literally laughed the hardest when I was reading the discussion points. Here are a couple:
- "While everyone waits outisde Hyde House, we are introduced to the students who will participate in the exam. Does the group seem like a typical cross section of today's college students?" All due respect, Mr Bell, but this is something you should've asked yourself BEFORE writing this nonsense.
- "Two characters behave heroically at the end. Did the behavior of either of those characters surprise you?" Well, one was you writing yourself into the book, so is this a question for your ex-girlfriends?
- "What do you think of Troy's character arc in the novel? Why and how has he changed?" Without spoilers, this is a hilarious question, but also, OK Mrs Jones-Keller, my 7th grade English teacher.
So yeah, nobody ever talks about how laughably bad writing can be. This one really opened my eyes.
This book was bad. Like really bad. Like, The Room bad. Giving it a 2 instead of a 1 because it was so bad that it was entertaining.
Before I dive into the actual book, let's start with the author. David Bell, according to the bio blurb, has an MA in creative writing, a PhD in American literature and creative writing, and is currently an English professor. OK, good credentials... We'll revisit them shortly.
The premise here is that six students are vying for an academic scholarship. This is no ordinary scholarship, mind you. It is the most prestigious scholarship for the school with the caveat being total secrecy and seclusion during the selection process. The reason? Rich people can do whatever they want. Because of this, the author is able to get six students, the vice president, and the wealthy Hyde family's sole heir and donor into a locked room mystery.
If these seems convoluted, bear with me, because it get a whole lot worse. See: part of this selection process involves every single person in the house having to give up their phones and other personal affects until the end of the process. This is enforced by the head of campus police as stated by the Hyde family's bylaws. Maybe now is a good time to mention that these bylaws can be changed once a year, so essentially the rules get changed as is convenient. Waiting staff is allowed into the house before the games begin, and no one is allowed in or out until the end, lest the entire scholarship is dissolved. Ah, so the stakes are high...I guess. And for some reason they're so high that there are no contingency measures for emergencies. Makes sense for a measly scholarship. Oh, and there are protests happening because dad gum liberals or whatever.
So, who is dumb enough to partake in this, you ask? We'll I'd love to tell you!
1) Milo - The Front Runner - This guy has it all! He's smart, everyone likes him, he's got a great personality, but everyone in this room has a jealousy problem with him. Whoa, hope nothing bad happens to him!
2) Natalia - The Brain - She's as smart as Milo, but she's undocumented. Ooooooooh.
3) James - The Rule Follower - He's not just a "rule follower." He's an old military guy. Not a single emotion in this guy, just logic. Real Data from Star Trek type stuff.
4) Sydney - The Athlete - Maybe not as smart as the others, but she really can play volleyball. Has some skeletons in her closet...but who doesn't, amirite?
5) Duffy - The Cowboy - Starts off with a cowboy hat, ends up just being a guy.
6) Emily - The Social Justice Warrior - All of these are directly from the back of the book. Someone actually wrote that down, not me. Yeah, she's a rude dude with a 'tude, but her intentions are good, I hope.
7) Vice President Troy Gaines - The university's go-between for the students and the Hyde family. He wants to keep both sides happy because he's just that good of a guy.
8) Nicholas Hyde - The sole heir to the Hyde Family fortune, this guy is a dickhead...or is he?
Every single one of these characters fucking sucked. They're all terrible, terrible caricatures written by a guy who's never ran into a single smart person, undocumented student and/or Latina, soldier and/or black person, athlete, cowboy, social justice warrior, or rich person in his life. Every single one of these doofuses is the direct reflection of how someone like the Vice Principal would see them. Going back to the author's role in academia: wow, who could've seen that coming? The vice principal's actions are hilariously dumb. He has no street smarts, barely any book smarts, and can't do simple things like opening a window or door.
From the moment the door locks, the plot points and mysteries just pile up like a huge stack of triceratops poo filled with sick. So, the college is simultaneously dirt poor but also extremely expensive and prestigious? The Hyde Family is soooooo rich that they can just pay for bazillions of dollars for students and their businesses but can't afford simple fixes on the one thing that keeps them in the public eye? Puh-lease. This book is just teeming with shit like this. It never gets better, only worse. Nobody makes any decisions that make sense whether or not you see the people as real characters or dumb stereotypes. They just kind of float through the book without direction, even Mr Logic. And then the book ends.
It's really hard to point out how ridiculous all of this is without giving spoilers, so yeah, I can't give this 1 star because I do think people should read it. Unlike most mysteries that will make you wonder what's going to happen next or who is responsible, you'll most likely be laughing and scratching your head.
And then the cherry on top? I don't know if it was the author or the publisher's doing, but there is a fucking Book Club Discussion at the end of this? Like, what the fuuuuuuuuuuck? Who needs to discuss this god damn book that was written by and adult for adults that reads like YA drivel? I literally laughed the hardest when I was reading the discussion points. Here are a couple:
- "While everyone waits outisde Hyde House, we are introduced to the students who will participate in the exam. Does the group seem like a typical cross section of today's college students?" All due respect, Mr Bell, but this is something you should've asked yourself BEFORE writing this nonsense.
- "Two characters behave heroically at the end. Did the behavior of either of those characters surprise you?" Well, one was you writing yourself into the book, so is this a question for your ex-girlfriends?
- "What do you think of Troy's character arc in the novel? Why and how has he changed?" Without spoilers, this is a hilarious question, but also, OK Mrs Jones-Keller, my 7th grade English teacher.
So yeah, nobody ever talks about how laughably bad writing can be. This one really opened my eyes.
Believe it or not, I really did want to like this. The story really had me up until about 2/3 of the way through. Then it just falls into a convoluted mess where its biggest downfall is that it tries too hard to explain every single little thing in a sort of Chekov’s universe. Sheesh!
While the end certainly ruined everything for me, I have to give credit where credit is due. I did quite enjoy most of the characters and felt like they were pretty realistic. And the main character’s reactions to how things unfolded cracked me up. It was very self-aware. Much like with Sager’s other work, Final Girls, the author toyed with the reader quite a bit and even poked fun at the genre and its fans’ expectations.
But was the ending really that bad? Absolutely. At first it was like “oh” and then “oh!” and further with “I can see that” and even a little “wtf?!” Sager just didn’t know when to quit though. Just when I thought I’d read it all, the twists and the callbacks and all that jazz just kept coming and coming with no sight in end. As if all of that wasn’t enough, there’s one more shocker thrown in and, to be quite honest, it was beyond dumb. At that point, the book went from dumb fun pulp territory to just straight up insultingly bad. Avoid at all costs.
Believe it or not, I really did want to like this. The story really had me up until about 2/3 of the way through. Then it just falls into a convoluted mess where its biggest downfall is that it tries too hard to explain every single little thing in a sort of Chekov’s universe. Sheesh!
While the end certainly ruined everything for me, I have to give credit where credit is due. I did quite enjoy most of the characters and felt like they were pretty realistic. And the main character’s reactions to how things unfolded cracked me up. It was very self-aware. Much like with Sager’s other work, Final Girls, the author toyed with the reader quite a bit and even poked fun at the genre and its fans’ expectations.
But was the ending really that bad? Absolutely. At first it was like “oh” and then “oh!” and further with “I can see that” and even a little “wtf?!” Sager just didn’t know when to quit though. Just when I thought I’d read it all, the twists and the callbacks and all that jazz just kept coming and coming with no sight in end. As if all of that wasn’t enough, there’s one more shocker thrown in and, to be quite honest, it was beyond dumb. At that point, the book went from dumb fun pulp territory to just straight up insultingly bad. Avoid at all costs.
In the first story, a character says of the genre, “In horror, it’s often what you leave out that gives a story its power.” This phrase does a lot of heavy lifting for some of the stories contained in this collection. That’s not necessarily a bad thing. Most of the horror in the book is super unsettling and leaves the reader wanting more.
Just one more thing I’d like to add before I jump into the individual stories: I don’t know what it is with Joe Hill or his dad but my goodness, each story of the first half of the collection has a jab at a disgusting fat person. What is the obsession?
Best New Horror - A story about a story. Both scary and unsettling. Good opening.
20th Century Ghost - A story about the love of cinema and nostalgia as much as it is a ghost story. Excellent.
Pop Art - Super unique tale of an inflatable best friend. Great from start to finish.
You Will Hear the Locust Sing - Like a Rated R Goosebumps story
Abraham’s Boys - The next Van Helsing generation. Not a great story, but good take and twist at the end.
Better Than Home - Fatherly love and baseball. No horror or suspense.
The Black Phone - It blows my mind that a 20 page story can get expanded into two films. Mediocre compared to some of the others, but probably the most adaptable, I guess.
In the Rundown - Feels incomplete but the ending was pretty crazy.
The Cape - Probably my least favorite of the bunch. Kid has a homemade cape that helps him fly, doesn’t understand.
Last Breath - One of the shortest stories but one of the best. It didn’t need to carry on for 100 pages. Self-aware with a crazy ending.
Dead-Wood - short poem about tree ghosts
The Widow’s Breakfast - Not really sure what to think about this one. Kinda rambled on.
Bobby Conroy Comes Back From the Dead - A man and woman are nostalgic for one another on the set of Dawn of the Dead
My Father’s Mask - One of the craziest things I’ve ever read. This story creeped me the hell out. Would love to get a short sequel or full story expansion.
Voluntary Committal - Very good concept and well done. Didn’t love the beginning or ending but the middle was very good.
Scheherazade’s Typewriter - very short story jammed into the acknowledgements. Very similar to something his dad would have written.
In the first story, a character says of the genre, “In horror, it’s often what you leave out that gives a story its power.” This phrase does a lot of heavy lifting for some of the stories contained in this collection. That’s not necessarily a bad thing. Most of the horror in the book is super unsettling and leaves the reader wanting more.
Just one more thing I’d like to add before I jump into the individual stories: I don’t know what it is with Joe Hill or his dad but my goodness, each story of the first half of the collection has a jab at a disgusting fat person. What is the obsession?
Best New Horror - A story about a story. Both scary and unsettling. Good opening.
20th Century Ghost - A story about the love of cinema and nostalgia as much as it is a ghost story. Excellent.
Pop Art - Super unique tale of an inflatable best friend. Great from start to finish.
You Will Hear the Locust Sing - Like a Rated R Goosebumps story
Abraham’s Boys - The next Van Helsing generation. Not a great story, but good take and twist at the end.
Better Than Home - Fatherly love and baseball. No horror or suspense.
The Black Phone - It blows my mind that a 20 page story can get expanded into two films. Mediocre compared to some of the others, but probably the most adaptable, I guess.
In the Rundown - Feels incomplete but the ending was pretty crazy.
The Cape - Probably my least favorite of the bunch. Kid has a homemade cape that helps him fly, doesn’t understand.
Last Breath - One of the shortest stories but one of the best. It didn’t need to carry on for 100 pages. Self-aware with a crazy ending.
Dead-Wood - short poem about tree ghosts
The Widow’s Breakfast - Not really sure what to think about this one. Kinda rambled on.
Bobby Conroy Comes Back From the Dead - A man and woman are nostalgic for one another on the set of Dawn of the Dead
My Father’s Mask - One of the craziest things I’ve ever read. This story creeped me the hell out. Would love to get a short sequel or full story expansion.
Voluntary Committal - Very good concept and well done. Didn’t love the beginning or ending but the middle was very good.
Scheherazade’s Typewriter - very short story jammed into the acknowledgements. Very similar to something his dad would have written.
I really love Hailey Piper's writing. This is my second book of hers and won't be the last. With this one, there were a few parts that lost me, but I loved it overall. The ending was incredibly beautiful.
I really love Hailey Piper's writing. This is my second book of hers and won't be the last. With this one, there were a few parts that lost me, but I loved it overall. The ending was incredibly beautiful.
The story was ok (3 stars) but minus 3 for the author being a stinky Zio
The story was ok (3 stars) but minus 3 for the author being a stinky Zio
I quite enjoyed reading this. It was a little slow to start and a bit confusing until a few chapters in and then really took off. One thing I love about this type of story is that the message is in the forefront moreso than the actual writing itself. It has no need to be overly wordy or descriptive and still manages to nail all the key points. Taichi Yamada hits the reader directly over the head with a man whose parents have died and the joy and anguish of having to deal with grieving all over again.
I didn’t love the last couple chapters, but I do think that the ending sort of leaves to interpretation whether or not he could have still gone to see his parents had he not (insert spoiler here).
I quite enjoyed reading this. It was a little slow to start and a bit confusing until a few chapters in and then really took off. One thing I love about this type of story is that the message is in the forefront moreso than the actual writing itself. It has no need to be overly wordy or descriptive and still manages to nail all the key points. Taichi Yamada hits the reader directly over the head with a man whose parents have died and the joy and anguish of having to deal with grieving all over again.
I didn’t love the last couple chapters, but I do think that the ending sort of leaves to interpretation whether or not he could have still gone to see his parents had he not (insert spoiler here).
What a fucking shitty book. I’m not even going to bother writing a review.
What a fucking shitty book. I’m not even going to bother writing a review.
Lmao like half of this book is 5 stars but half of this book is 1 star. You “I was paid to write an honest review” folks need to start writing honest reviews.
There are some interesting ideas, sure. But let’s be honest here. What makes this a 5 star book? Is it original? No. Is it written exceptionally well? No. Are plot points followed completely? No. Are metaphors clear and explicit? No.
First and foremost: is the overall point of this book original in any way? Not in the slightest.
I’m just gonna skip the nitpicking and go straight into the meat. People are bad? Let’s corrupt a child because that’s how humans are. Oh wait, let’s go deeper…and then just…not? The whole book is a misogynistic exploration into wives and Malerman doesn’t even have the cojones to bring up the “b*tch wife’s” cheating when she’s “being honest”? Come on, bro…
A good 80% of the characters were antitheses of Chekov’s guns and most everything ended up going nowhere. Without spoiling, the ending was completely botched. Just like Tik Tok political discourse, I’m getting super jaded on reading reviews on here.
TL;dr turns out Josh Malerman just isn’t a very good writer
Lmao like half of this book is 5 stars but half of this book is 1 star. You “I was paid to write an honest review” folks need to start writing honest reviews.
There are some interesting ideas, sure. But let’s be honest here. What makes this a 5 star book? Is it original? No. Is it written exceptionally well? No. Are plot points followed completely? No. Are metaphors clear and explicit? No.
First and foremost: is the overall point of this book original in any way? Not in the slightest.
I’m just gonna skip the nitpicking and go straight into the meat. People are bad? Let’s corrupt a child because that’s how humans are. Oh wait, let’s go deeper…and then just…not? The whole book is a misogynistic exploration into wives and Malerman doesn’t even have the cojones to bring up the “b*tch wife’s” cheating when she’s “being honest”? Come on, bro…
A good 80% of the characters were antitheses of Chekov’s guns and most everything ended up going nowhere. Without spoiling, the ending was completely botched. Just like Tik Tok political discourse, I’m getting super jaded on reading reviews on here.
TL;dr turns out Josh Malerman just isn’t a very good writer