Andrew

I wish the essays had focused more on technique, and at times they didn't even really feel to be about writing at all; nevertheless, I enjoyed this book quite a bit. It just wasn't quite what I wanted (so the problem was me, not it).

But one useful thing I did learn is that ideas are like cats:

You treat ideas like cats: you make them follow you. If you try to approach a cat and pick it up, hell, it won't let you do it. You've got to say, “Well, to hell with you.” And the cat says, “Wait a minute. He's not behaving the way most humans do.” Then the cat follows you out of curiosity: “Well, what's wrong with you that you don't love me?”

are

This book has long been a favorite of mine. I've read it twice in print, listened to it once as an audiobook, and just finished it again, this time on my Kindle. This is a book that I've continued to come back to because the world is super interesting and the characters are wonderful. Has some of the content become a bit dated? Definitely. But the storytelling brilliance contained between the front and back covers of this book is mesmerizing.

With every passing word, The Divine Comedy becomes more and more impenetrable. The first part, Inferno, is magnificent and even at times funny. The second, Purgatorio, is where things begin to fall apart; around halfway through this second section, the book turns into musing of philosophical ideas, long speeches by characters extolling their ideas (Dante's ideas) on universal truths, how the universe works, and by Hell, Purgatory, and Life are arranged as they are. The third part, Paradiso, is only more of these long speeches and dialogues, but lacks the element that made the first two parts so entertaining: Virgil, the Roman poet, who serves as Dante's guide through hell and purgatory, who is not allowed to usher him through heaven because he was a pagan (although the best sort of pagan). The third section replaces Virgil with Beatrice, a woman with whom Dante seems to be in love (more on this in a second).

Fundamentally, this book is an excuse for Dante to make fun of people he doesn't like (by putting them in the various, deeper sections of hell and purgatory) and to laud people he does like (by putting them, like Virgil, in the “best” part of hell, or on planets in the solar system more close to God's throne). Really, this is just Dante's way of poking fun at contemporary politics and near history to his day, and when the purpose seems to be satire and mockery the poem works exceptionally well. This all comes to a head when Beatrice is introduced, a woman from Dante's real life whom he was smitten with before she (apparently) died, who guides Dante through heaven, is more beautiful than anything else he has ever seen, and is revealed to be a woman so holy that she gets to stand next to the Virgin Mary.

That's right, this whole book is just a setup for Dante to simp for a dead lady. SPOILERS, right? I'm pretty sure the statute of limitations has passed on this thin.

I didn't hate this, but I didn't love the last two-thirds of it, either. It gets three stars because the Inferno was a ton of fun. Also, this book is illuminating where the medieval worldview is concerned. The various theological themes, the way the zones of each of the three books are separated, the depictions and imagery, the alignment and ordination of the solar system...it's all fundamental stuff, if one want to try and make sense of medieval theology or culture. For that reason, I'm definitely glad that I listened to this. Also, the narrator was incredible.

I want to like this more because I want to be well-read and smart. But maybe being smart is overrated.