Normal People may not be for everyone, but it's absolutely worth giving a try.
Sally Rooney's characters are extremely believable and lifelike. You feel their highs and lows, and like people in our own lives, they are flawed. I think in this lies the issue that many people have with Normal People:the main characters don't act like you want them to. They don't communicate well and they make decisions that actively make their lives worse, but wanting them to act differently is much like reflecting on a conflict you had in your own life and wishing it went differently– “Damn, I should've said ‘x' instead of what I actually said.”
Connell and Marianne make mistakes, but they also have successes. They have good role models and bad influences in their lives. I enjoyed watching their lives unfold, and continue to enjoy imagining how their lives would continue; either together or apart.
I also must say that I have never empathized with a character more than when Connell seeks counseling at his university. When I was reading this, I too was talking to university doctors about treating my anxiety; something I didn't realize I was dealing with for years. After my mother read this book it was a big help for me to be able to tell her that I was going through what Connell did in college. She didn't know anyone who was open to her about their struggles with mental health, but she knew Connell and I didn't have to start from scratch when I tried to explain how I was feeling.
Thanks Sally for helping me to be feel understood.
This book is an excellent resource for someone who has read passages of the Bible, identified contradictions, and been interested how religious scholars address them. Ehrman plainly describes how Christians throughout history have interpreted passages of the Bible that do not align with each other and provides historical context on how and why some of these stories were included in the first place.
It's difficult to say how others might feel upon reading this. I feel that Ehrman's writing is fairly objective and he's honest that he does not believe in Christianity the way he once did, but still cares to study the Bible as a historical document. My biggest takeaway is that being a Christian requires a type of faith that I just don't have. A true believer would read this book and not care that there are contradictions in the Bible– they would remain steadfast in their faith because they believe in god. Ehrman also makes it clear that there are a number of aspects of Christianity that just aren't supported by rational accounts (e.g. Jesus rising from the dead), but believing these things in spite of the evidence is what makes someone a believer.
I can imagine some die-hard Christians reading this, calling it blasphemy, and refusing to finish it. I think that's an unfair assessment as much of what Ehrman describes is just exactly what is written in the Bible or other established historical documents (I think it's fascinating that Ehrman has studied ancient Greek and is able to read some of these documents in their original form). Reading this information and still believing is probably a good sign that you really believe.
If someone is on the fence about Christianity I would guess that reading this book would push you towards the non-believer side of things. If that idea scares you, maybe come back to it after some time. For me, there was not a single passage that made me reconsider my choice to not believe in Christianity.
This was my first book by Ehrman that I've read and I enjoyed his writing style and tone. I would definitely read more of his works. I must admit that I was on the fence about rating this 4 or 5 stars, however, as this was a bit of tough read for me to finish. It's definitely written in an accessible manner, but it still is an academic document about religious history and at times I found it boring. I don't think anyone would be clamoring to finish it after beginning, but I took my time and read it a bit at a time and feel glad that I completed it. Ehrman is himself a well-read person and he has taken the time to review an unbelievable amount of documents, and I think he did his best presenting this information to a wide audience. I'm looking forward to reading more.
Mary Roach does an impeccable job of discussing a complicated topic in an approachable way. Death and dying are topics that make many people uncomfortable, but ultimately dying is something everyone is going to experience at some point. I went into this book already having a very open mindset about cadavers. I was already interested in donating my organs, and have explored the idea of donating my body to science. I believe that all of us benefit from advances in medicine that have happened as a result of people who came before us donating their bodies to science, and it is only right to do my part and allow for the continuation of this process. This book helped me appreciate how truly wide the impact of cadavers on research is. Some of these uses are not so glamourous, but ultimately a lot of advances in automotive safety, forensics, and medicine have come about as a result of working with cadavers. I was also glad to find out that this is not an exposé about how cadavers are mistreated in today's society. Instead, it brought tears to my eyes to read about how many people treat cadavers with a lot of respect and care. I previously assumed that most people working in the medical field would treat cadavers as equipment or solely biological material. Surprisingly, many medical students treat the cadavers with a lot of reverence and care, and it made me more accepting of the idea of donating my own body. When this book was recommended to me, I did not realize that it came out back in 2003. I think overall many of the sentiments about the dead have not changed since its release– many Americans are still divided about burying embalmed bodies vs choosing cremation, and “green burials” are still far from mainstream. I do feel that the content is still important, and its focus on the history of cadavers also makes the book timeless. It will always be interesting to read about how intertwined medical schools and grave robbing were, and the myths and facts of cannibalism in the past. I would definitely recommend this book to others, with the caveat that it probably isn't for the squeamish. I work in medical research and have seen a number of gross things in my time, but I could still feel my hands get a little clammy reading Roach describe some of the sights and smells she encountered during her fieldwork. I would honestly love to see Roach work on an update to Stiff at some point as I would be very curious to see how the field has changed over time. Are there new areas of research that require the use of cadavers? Are there fields where the use of cadavers has been retired? Research at body farms is ongoing in the US; what new developments have there been over the last 20 years and what is being planned for the future? Looking forward to reading [b:Spook: Science Tackles the Afterlife 14990 Spook Science Tackles the Afterlife Mary Roach https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1401287778l/14990.SX50.jpg 2398507], [b:Gulp: Adventures on the Alimentary Canal 18377999 Gulp Adventures on the Alimentary Canal Mary Roach https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1391866061l/18377999.SX50.jpg 19216563], and [b:Fuzz: When Nature Breaks the Law 56769577 Fuzz When Nature Breaks the Law Mary Roach https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1619615618l/56769577.SY75.jpg 88729211] soon!
Misery is incredibly suspenseful and captivating. I love horror films and that feeling of suspense or dread that they can give you, but I never thought that I could feel that same way reading a horror novel. Misery absolutely achieves this! There were a number of times I was genuinely terrified for Paul and read on with clenched teeth and a rapid heartbeat.
My only complaint with the novel was that some of the “Misery Returns” sections of Misery took me out of the overall narrative. I understand that the monotony of the story can sometimes highlight Paul's relationship with the Misery series and how he just wants it to be over, but I think this was well conveyed without making the excerpts themselves so drawn out. I would be interested in an edit of this book that only includes the “real world” sections of the novel, and see how it compares to the original.
40 Books
See all
