Omar
Good story and storytelling. Interesting description of the roman characters and events. This does not apply for the Carthaginian characters. Anibal was not described with the same enthusiasm as his counterparts.
The main drawback: the author's technique to make the reader remember the characters and events is constantly and merciless repetition.
An entertaining recount of the rise and fall of a good idea. A dissection of a bad executed plan for good-willing goal.
It was a nice idea to have a story with a soundtrack. However, the story felt apart as soon as the last main characters appeared. Also, I think the author abused of the soundtrack thread. The “end” seemed to me a “Deus ex machina”.
J'ai trouvé ce roman très intéressant. La description des personnages, des scénarios et des scènes représente une image claire de ce qui se passe à l'extérieur et à l'intérieur de l'indifférence de Meursault. C'est un très bon travail.
La manera sencilla en la que escribe los ensayos hace de cada uno de ellos una descripción agradable e interesante de los temas.