A Reasonable Response

Craig is clearly capable, but somehow he still thinks its acceptable to answer many questions in the book by doing this: without God/Christianity, life would be meaningless, therefore God/Christianity are true/you should believe in them. Or, he refutes the statement that “God is not evident to all of those that earnestly seek him” by saying that those that don't find God self-evident are in denial or just need more time. This is supposed to be a book based on reasonable responses, implying reason is employed in the answers to the “tough questions.” Instead of reason, WLC touts faith.

The whole thing is just baffling. I hope his other books are better.