Evil Women

Some historical female murderers that are not mentioned much or in this book but are still worth reading/learning about are: Belle Gunness, Amelia Dyer, Jane Toppan (A sexual sadist)
I'm getting a bit fed with the generalised sexist point of view or opinion of men that female murderers, serial killers are “rare”
I think the Introduction is a bit sexist to be honest but that is just my honest opinion.
Like it it not but women are just as capable of being a sadist, sexual sadist, perverted, deviant, sadistic & peadophiles as much as men are.
Not all female serial killers murder their intended victim(s) for profit/their life insurance. These specific types of female serial killers are known as a “black widow” they get married, take a life insurance policy sometimes multiple polices then plan how they will murder their husband. They then claim the life insurance and act like the grueving wife of the re ently deceased husband. Thry nirmally fo this several times, they usually have multiple husbands or boyfriends that mysteriously die unexpectedly because they were murdered.
A lot of female serial killers have a personal vendetta against one man in particular or all men in general.
Their type of victim(s) may resemble a man in their life that abused them, so they maybe mephahorically murdering their father, boyfriend or someone else man that has been in their life so the victim(s) symbolically represent that person from their life.
This aspect never seems to be taken in consideration as a motive for women to become a sadist/sexual sadist, murderer/potential serial killer.
For some women their motivation for murder us revenge for various types of abuse, rape, torture, gang rape.
Women can be a sexual deviant, perverted, a sadist, sexual sadist, perverted, mentally ill/disturbed, psychotic, delusional, women can sexually motivated to commit crimes.
A small minority of women would be a masochist & a sadist (they like inflicting pain on themselves & others) Joanne Dennehy is a good example. She would self-harm, but she also liked inflicting pain onto other peopke and went on a killing spree, randomly murdering people she didn't know because it was fun gor her in her opinion. She was obsessed with blood, inflicting pain onto men. She is a sadist.
Some women are a sadist & eager to please their boyfriend, husband and a willing & compliant participant in kidnapping, keeping a victim held captive, and engaging in the sexual/physical torture of the victim(s) resulting in their death.
Karla Homola, Myra Hindley & Rose West as perfect examples of sexual sadists/serial killers that are women.
There are different catergories for male serial killers why does the same apply to female serial killers?

Jane Andrews: Her relationship with her parents and having a abortion severely affected her mentally/emotionally. She may have felt neglected by her parents, or men in general hence her attention-seeking behaviour such as a drug overdoses, acting sexually provacative, flirty with any man that showed interest in her.
It seems like when things don't go her way, or the way she wanted them to be then she acts out and engages in attention-seeking behaviour. Her being diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder would explain her weird behaviour, her state of mind at the time and how/why her relationship with Tom Cressman was toxic, codependent, abusive. Both of them seem like they are toxic and narcissistic peopke hence why they would go out of their way to publically humiliate eachother to prove a point. They weren't right for eachother and they should have ended their relationship amicably when Tom said he didn't want to marry her. His death could have been avoided.
Interest on bdsm in anal sex, bondage or role-playing to a lot of people is considered “tame” or “normal” I understand it's not for everyone, but I think it's not necessary to “kink-shame” men or women. I understand why people are uncomfortable about, but if it involves consenting adults and doesn't harm people then who are you or anyone to judge people for liking bdsm?
It's hard to judge and say if Tom was abusive or if Jane was saying/acting like he was abusive to gain attention & sympathy.
She is a murderer regardless of how or why it happened.

Tracie Andrews: So far the women mentioned in this book seem like unreliable witnesses/the person responsible for a crime(s) and tried to deflect blame with a false, fake/made up and totally unbeliavable story. They seem to have false memories or create a fake account of what happened which is neither true or belivable They claim to be the “victim” when they are the murderer.
The audacity and sense of entitlement to claim they have been victimised due to being a narcissist, is ridiculous and disgusting.
Tracie Andrews was always guilty & suspicious from the start, I have seen a documentary about them so I already knew about the case.
I appreciate that the book includes photographs of the female murderers in the book, not all true crime books include a image, photograph of the person that is mentioned in the book.
I can't believe she bit her fiancee, and physically hit him in public and in front of people.