Ratings5
Average rating4
The definitive military chronicle of the Iraq war and a searing judgment on the strategic blindness with which America has conducted it, drawing on the accounts of senior military officers giving voice to their anger for the first time.Pulitzer Prize-winning Washington Post senior Pentagon correspondant Thomas E. Ricks's Fiasco is masterful and explosive reckoning with the planning and execution of the American military invasion and occupation of Iraq, based on the unprecedented candor of key participants.The American military is a tightly sealed community, and few outsiders have reason to know that a great many senior officers view the Iraq war with incredulity and dismay. But many officers have shared their anger with renowned military reporter Thomas E. Ricks, and in Fiasco, Ricks combines these astonishing on-the-record military accounts with his own extraordinary on-the-ground reportage to create a spellbinding account of an epic disaster.As many in the military publicly acknowledge here for the first time, the guerrilla insurgency that exploded several months after Saddam's fall was not foreordained. In fact, to a shocking degree, it was created by the folly of the war's architects. But the officers who did raise their voices against the miscalculations, shortsightedness, and general failure of the war effort were generally crushed, their careers often ended. A willful blindness gripped political and military leaders, and dissent was not tolerated.There are a number of heroes in Fiasco-inspiring leaders from the highest levels of the Army and Marine hierarchies to the men and women whose skill and bravery led to battlefield success in towns from Fallujah to Tall Afar-but again and again, strategic incoherence rendered tactical success meaningless. There was never any question that the U.S. military would topple Saddam Hussein, but as Fiasco shows there was also never any real thought about what would come next. This blindness has ensured the Iraq war a place in history as nothing less than a fiasco. Fair, vivid, and devastating, Fiasco is a book whose tragic verdict feels definitive.
Reviews with the most likes.
Ricks' book is a stunning critique of the United States' invasion of Iraq that is explanatory and engaging, and not as dry or fact-dense as many books pertaining to the war in Iraq typically are. It's persuasive and insightful, and it made me want to investigate Wolfowitz, Zinni, and Petraeus more. I now feel as though I have a better grasp on what has happened in Iraq, though I do recognize Ricks' potential bias. I'm curious to read his next book, The Gamble shortly. I highly recommend this book to anyone who is interested in the war in Iraq without an overt Western bias or overt Muslim/Arab bias, but interested in why strategies, tactics, and planning—or lack thereof—have made the American military invasion of Iraq so problematic. It's a well-written book that is informative without excess use of jargon.