Fields of Blood: Religion and the History of Violence
Ratings3
Average rating4.3
For the first time in American history, religious self-identification is on the decline. Some have cited a perception that began to grow after September 11: that faith in general is a source of aggression, intolerance and divisiveness--something bad for society. But how accurate is that view? And does it apply equally to all faiths? In these troubled times, we risk basing decisions of real and dangerous consequence on mistaken understandings of the faiths subscribed around us, in our immediate community as well as globally. And so, with her deep learning and sympathetic understanding, Karen Armstrong examines the impulse toward violence in each of the world's great religions.--
Reviews
Popular Reviews
Reviews with the most likes.
Really more like 3.5 stars. Armstrong is an excellent writer and starts the book off very strong, but it becomes more of a recounting of important episodes than adding anything new or interesting to the thesis. Still, I appreciated the breadth of the book and the style, so it was well worth the time.
I'm a sucker for sweeping histories and this one is generally excellent, avoiding some of the worst pitfalls of the genre. Lots of interesting history presented with only a thin (if adamant) guiding theory of the history of violence (and religion's role in it). She is occasionally guilty of the sin of defining both everything and nothing as “religious” or “quasi-religious” after working hard to establish the difficulty of defining the term (especially transhistorically). The afterword gives a moving polemical summary of the moral upshot of the book.
