How to Argue With a Racist: History, Science, Race and Reality

How to Argue With a Racist

History, Science, Race and Reality

2020 • 240 pages

Ratings11

Average rating3.7

15

THE SUNDAY TIMES BESTSELLER 'Nobody deals with challenging subjects more interestingly and compellingly than Adam Rutherford, and this may be his best book yet. This is a seriously important work' BILL BRYSON 'A fascinating and timely refutation of the casual racism on the rise around the world. The ultimate anti-racism guide for data-lovers everywhere' CAROLINE CRIADO PEREZ *** Race is real because we perceive it. Racism is real because we enact it. But the appeal to science to strengthen racist ideologies is on the rise - and increasingly part of the public discourse on politics, migration, education, sport and intelligence. Stereotypes and myths about race are expressed not just by overt racists, but also by well-intentioned people whose experience and cultural baggage steer them towards views that are not supported by the modern study of human genetics. Even some scientists are uncomfortable expressing opinions deriving from their research where it relates to race. Yet, if understood correctly, science and history can be powerful allies against racism, granting the clearest view of how people actually are, rather than how we judge them to be. HOW TO ARGUE WITH A RACIST is a vital manifesto for a twenty-first century understanding of human evolution and variation, and a timely weapon against the misuse of science to justify bigotry.

Become a Librarian

Reviews

Popular Reviews

Reviews with the most likes.

Perhaps a little drier than I had expected but an informative read nonetheless.

June 21, 2020

study the fine arts of antiracism to hone my racism

Jokes aside its a good shout if you're just getting into evolutionary biology, and want insight into how it coalesces with race, aswell as debunking racialism arguments. Suitable for beginners

January 1, 2023

if you're not black then you shouldn't be saying the n word. i don't care if you're quoting/being historically accurate, don't use it.

July 8, 2020