Salt: A World History
Ratings35
Average rating3.7
15
Ratings35
Average rating3.7
“Kurlansky finds the world in a grain of salt.” - New York Times Book Review An unlikely world history from the bestselling author of Cod and The Basque History of the World In his fifth work of nonfiction, Mark Kurlansky turns his attention to a common household item with a long and intriguing history: salt. The only rock we eat, salt has shaped civilization from the very beginning, and its story is a glittering, often surprising part of the history of humankind. A substance so valuable it served as currency, salt has influenced the establishment of trade routes and cities, provoked and financed wars, secured empires, and inspired revolutions. Populated by colorful characters and filled with an unending series of fascinating details, Salt is a supremely entertaining, multi-layered masterpiece.
Reviews with the most likes.
So, I love microhistories. There's just something SO satisfying about learning a lot about the world by ostensibly learning about something small and contained. And Salt is basically the ur-microhistory – one of the first and most famous books in the genre.
By my typical standards of microhistory, Salt is a win: every conversation I had while reading it eventually came around to me saying something like “so did you know that one of the major advantages of the North in the civil war is that they had more salt mines?” and (since I read it while in Austria) “did you know that they used to open salt mines to the general public as adventure rides?” And I did learn a lot about (broader) history through the infinity stories of “this area used to belong to tribe, but nation came and took it over because it had a good access to sea salt” but overall, I found the book boring. Not that the topic was boring, but, well Kurlansky's writing style was not ideal for me...he simply doesn't have any form of linking information. He'll state a sentence but not link it to related concepts in the chapter, or provide any sort of information about why that particular fact is interesting. If background information is needed for context he doesn't provide it. My own textbook writing is filled with linking phrases like “therefore, it follows that...” or “in light of this, it's particularly interesting that...” to keep the reader grounded in how things relate to each other. Also, each chapter contains recipes for no clear reason. Often the recipes use quantities that aren't defined anywhere and Kurlansky won't tell us what he intends the recipe to be an example of?
Kurlansky also perseverates on some topics: like salted fish. I think there were three chapters on salted fish, and yes, this is a microhistory, but there's really a limit of how much I want to know about salted fish.
But the content was excellent and I'm glad I read it. Just, next time, hopefully with any degree of structure
Positive: I now know way more about salt in history than I ever imagined before.
Negative: I'm not sure I wanted to know quite that much about salt, and did the book really need to be quite that long?
I learned so much from this book about world history, culture, and trade than I thought I would...of course, salt is still salt, but it has real power.
This book changed my life. I picked it up because fiction novels were all looking the same to me, and because it was thick enough to last the long train ride from Dusseldorf to Maastricht. School textbooks were the only non-fiction I'd ever read, and they had not prepared me for the vibrant and engaging writing found in Salt. Since reading this book I have become a devoted fan of non-fiction writing, which has exposed me to a whole new world of literature.
