Ratings1
Average rating5
Spinoza's theoretical philosophy is one of the most radical attempts to construct a pure ontology with a single infinite substance. This book, which presents Spinoza's main ideas in dictionary form, has as its subject the opposition between ethics and morality, and the link between ethical and ontological propositions. His ethics is an ethology, rather than a moral science. Attention has been drawn to Spinoza by deep ecologists such as Arne Naess, the Norwegian philosopher; and this reading of Spinoza by Deleuze lends itself to a radical ecological ethic. As Robert Hurley says in his introduction, "Deleuze opens us to the idea that the elements of the different individuals we compose may be nonhuman within us. One wonders, finally, whether Man might be defined as a territory, a set of boundaries, a limit on existence." Gilles Deleuze, known for his inquiries into desire, language, politics, and power, finds a kinship between Spinoza and Nietzsche. He writes, ""Spinoza did not believe in hope or even in courage; he believed only in joy and in vision . . . he more than any other gave me the feeling of a gust of air from behind each time I read him, of a witch's broom that he makes one mount. Gilles Deleuze was a professor of philosophy at the University of Paris at Vincennes. Robert Hurley is the translator of Michel Foucault's History of Sexuality.
Reviews with the most likes.
Reading this book is an entire experience. Tailored. Composed. Like Wind. You then find yourself immersed in an entirely different world, or, “plane”. You feel the third kind of Divine knowledge seeping into your mind, the idea of your body. You eventually find a romantic melody from Deleuze to Spinoza, filled with love and life. All the terms, concepts, ideas, jump up from the previous chapters and somehow composite into the most beautiful poetry. After finishing the book, I set it down and audibly gasped: “That was so good.”
It is almost like a masterpiece of video game, except with words. You progress along Deleuze's designated path, you might not understand all of it, then you plunge into the open world of alphabetical definitions. You jump back and forth and choose your own path. You then encounter an epic ending that gives meaning to all the following replays/rereads. Note that this comparison is purely affectional, the Spinozist way.