Ratings32
Average rating3.8
The Princess and the Goblin is a very underrated tale. For years I didn't even know it was a book. I thought it was just an animated kids movie.
The start of this book is extremely hard to get into. The princess is young. Around 6 years old. She doesn't have many worries. She's sheltered from the truth of the goblins that live in the mountain. It's not until Curdie is introduced that the story picks up. While the princess Irene is focused on her invisible grandmother, Curdie drives the plot forward. His were the chapters I flew through.
Other readers commented on the author's writing style. Oftentimes it felt like he was too lazy to finish describing the scene. It grew frustrating. I was ready to give up early in the book because I hated his style so much. Reader, if you think of giving up, don't. Push through. It gets better.
I really give this book 3.5 stars. The beginning was worth 2, the 2/3 mark picks up to a 5. I heard there is a sequel. I'm curious to see what happens next.
What a delightful story! Mystery, adventure, magic, and the sweetest little heroine (8-year-old Princess Irene)- this was the perfect vacation fairy tale read!
It's a classic for a reason; I highly recommend it!
3.5-4 stars. This basically reads like a regular children's fantasy book and would be very nostalgic/familiar to any readers familiar with Enid Blyton.
Princess Irene is an 8 year old little girl who one day stumbles upon a long-lost ancestor, whom she calls her grandmother for simplicity's sake, just living in a corner of her castle. Later on, while out with her nurse Lootie, she meets the young son of a miner, Curdie Peterson, who teaches them that goblins are nothing to be afraid of. They later find save each other from goblins.
Make no mistake, this is thoroughly a standard-fare children's fantasy book. There're so many books that read like this nowadays that on first read, it doesn't immediately feel particularly fresh or amazing.
But I think the full impact of it is best appreciated when reading more on the context of the book's production. Macdonald was seen as the founding father of modern fantasy. he was a mentor of Lewis Caroll (and his children's positive reception of Alice in Wonderland encouraged Carroll to publish it) and apparently influenced even Tolkien in the depiction of goblins in the Legendarium. i don't even think there were fantasy books like this before Macdonald (although I am not an expert on the history of this genre so I can't say for sure).
Being a standard Victorian fairy tale, the book was full of moralistic “good values” for children, although it doesn't feel so grating somehow, probably because I lived and breathed Enid Blyton growing up. I thought the values that it tried to bring across weren't overly preachy - Princess Irene was never proud or encouraged to maintain a divide between herself and a “lower class” person like Curdie. In fact, she reprimands her nurse for trying to get Curdie to call her “Your Royal Highness”, which she thinks is “name-calling only for rude children”.
In the case of Irene's grandmother, there's a very complex situation there where Curdie is unable to see this lady-ancestor even when Irene brings him to her room. He's also unable to see the magic thread that the grandmother has spun for Irene to hold on to in times of trouble, which is the only reason why she manages to find Curdie when he is captured by the goblins, and lead him out to safety. Curdie is rude to Irene, who thinks that she is simply getting carried away by her fancies and “taking him in” - he is reprimanded by his mother who thinks that just because he can't see it doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. Irene is rude to Curdie as she's offended, but then she's also reprimanded by her grandmother who says that he can't help not being able to see what she is able to. This is an unexpectedly complex situation that I think would go over the heads of most children, but might still stick around in their subconsciousness for years to come.
If you're picking up this book expecting something that'll blow your mind, you will be disapopinted. Rather, I'd recommend it for anyone looking to (re)visit moralistic Victorian children's fairy tales, or if you're a fantasy buff and would like to experience this really simple children's story that started the domino effect and set the historical stage for works like Alice in Wonderland and Lord of the Rings in the century following its publication.
A wonderful fairy tale that reads as if your grandfather was telling a story round a campfire. It reminded me very much of C.S. Lewis' Narnia series, or Tolkien's Hobbit. A perfect bedtime read for ANY age. I can't wait to read the sequel and find out what more happens to Irene and Curdie!
An old, yet completely new-to-me story of a lonely princess, her mysterious grandmother, her (largely) absent father, a young miner boy, and lots and lots and lots of scary goblins. (Turns out—and this isn't giving anything away—goblins, though quite dangerous and scary, hate rhyme and have very sensitive feet).
I went into this expecting something of a fairy tale, but the story went on and on for an additional hundred pages. Lots of nice surprises, but I wish it had been a bit shorter read.
For a fairytale, written for children, and quite some time ago, it's wonderful. If one starts to think about the negatives, it's less wonderful, which is why I won't be thinking about the negatives :-D