The Splendid and the Vile

Erik Larson is my favorite non-fiction author and while he doesn't turn in his best work here (I still think Devil in the White City is superior), this book is still a good read. Larson excels at writing non-fiction in a fiction style, shaping his narrative off of Vonnegut's “Man in the Hole” story arcs (where the main character “experiences great fortune, then deep misfortune, before climbing back up to achieve even greater success”). Where this book lacks however is in the subject. Churchill has been written about so much that it is challenging to find something new to share and Larson acknowledges this in the Sources and Acknowledgements chapter at the end of the book, saying “One danger in writing about Churchill is that you'll become overwhelmed at the very start [...] by the sheer volume of work already in the public domain.” But what Larson does to counteract this is to focus on a short-window, the first year of his Prime Minister-ship and he gives space for small moments of humanity. Some of my favorite moments were the love stories between minor characters in the midst of terrible bombing raids. Larson says this eloquently saying “I tried also to bring to the foreground characters often given secondary treatment in the big histories. Every Churchill scholar has quoted the diaries of John Colville, but it seemed to me that Colville wanted to be a character in his own right, so I tried to oblige him. I know of no other work that mentions his bittersweet romantic obsession with Gay Margesson [...] [Scholars] dismissed these and other omissions as ‘trivial entries which are of no general interest.' At the time he actually made them, however, the events at hand were anything but trivial. What I found so interesting about his pursuit of Gay was that it unfolded while London was aflame, with bombs falling every day, and somehow the two of them managed to carve out moments of, as he put it, ‘sufficient bliss'”. This is where all of Larson's works excel - in creating space and time to recognize small moments of humanity in the midst of larger-than-life historical events. You can feel like you were there because he slows down time and allows for the real moments of life to spill in (just because a war is on, regular life doesn't come to a complete halt, like so history books seem to imply). I just found that there were ultimately too few of these moments to make this as great as his other works. All in all, Larson's writing still excels and this novel is worth reading not only for the moments of humanity he presents but also the displays of leadership he explains. Churchill really seemed like the right leader at the right time and it made me wonder what our current crisis would be like under different leadership.

I think Erik Larson is a fantastic non-fiction author; the way he folds quotes from primary sources (in this case, mostly diaries and recorded speeches) and dramatically structures scenes makes it read like fiction. Churchill has been biographied/written about ad nauseam, but this is an interesting take that focused just as much on the cast of characters surrounding Churchill as the man himself; it is at once a family drama and a war drama. The book begins as Churchill is announced PM, and goes all the way through the US enters the war. I personally have not read many Britain-centric WWII content, so it was interesting hearing about civilian life during the bombings, the new war technologies and tactics (though I found that bit less interesting than the more humanistic angles), the long persuasion of the US to join the war, and a bit about certain characters from the German side (pilots, high-ranking officials). However, it is a long book, and did start losing my interest by the middle/end.

One sentence synopsis... A deep, detailed, and personal exploration of the twelve month long bombing campaign known as the Battle of Britain and Churchill's leadership throughout. .

Read it if you like... Larson's other books, ‘The Devil in the White City' and ‘In the Garden of Beasts' to name a few. He writes nonfiction history better than anyone, using only real documents and quotes to craft a cinematic story. It's refreshing to take a break from today's political mess and read about true leadership. .

Further reading... see next slide (this isn't even a comprehensive stack of all our Churchill books).

This was a long, but satisfying read. I enjoyed Larson's book In the Garden of Beasts, also set around World War II, so I knew I would also enjoy this one.

I have always found Winston Churchill to be a fascinating character, but I never read any of the books about him. I was worried they would be too tedious to read. When I saw that Larson was writing one, I knew this was the time to read about him. Larson has a skillful way of writing history that I feel like I'm reading a fictional story. It makes history easier to read.

I learned a lot about the that first year of air raids in England. It was very interesting and informative. The detail from people's journals gives great insight into the emotions of the British people at that time. It is obvious that Larson did a great deal of research.

I would definitely recommend this book to fans of Larson and fans of WWII history in general. It is a great read!

Coveting power for power's sake was a “base” pursuit, he wrote, adding, “But power in a national crisis, when a man believes he knows what orders should be given, is a blessing.” He felt great relief. “At last I had the authority to give directions over the whole scene. I felt as if I were walking with destiny, and that all my past life had been but a preparation for this hour and for this trial....

Churchill. The Splendid and the Vile is the story of Winston Churchill, and Churchill is a person who embodies the greatest qualities of leadership in the world.

Churchill took the job as prime minister of England on the day Belgium, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands were overrun by Germany. France was near defeat. Much of Europe was Germany's.

A group of people waiting at the private entrance to No. 10 offered their congratulations and encouragement, with cries of “Good luck, Winnie. God bless you.” Churchill was deeply moved, Ismay saw. Upon entering the building, Churchill, never afraid to express emotion, began to weep. “Poor people, poor people,” he said. “They trust me, and I can give them nothing but disaster for quite a long time.”

The speech set a pattern that he would follow throughout the war, offering a sober appraisal of facts, tempered with reason for optimism. “It would be foolish to disguise the gravity of the hour,” he said. “It would be still more foolish to lose heart and courage.”

Erik Larson is a good writer and weaves together a vivid set of diaries and letters.

Listening to Churchill's family and friends easily discuss their privilege of their lives (nannies, valets, cooks, large salaries from press barons) made me feel more socialist. It was not the authors intention at all, but the book makes it very clear how absent the lives of all the non-British of British empire were from their discussions and decisions - which made me reflect that maybe with a slightly different peace in 1917 - the brutal empires of Europe could have continued for far longer.