Ratings15
Average rating3.2
Mata Hari is a fascinating historical figure, and her story is one that is both exciting and a testament to the injustices that women face in patriarchal societies. She deserves books that explain the sensational and extraordinary life that she led.
This, unfortunately, is not that book. Coehlo chooses to frame his story through a series of letters written at the end of Mata Hari's life, and in doing so makes the story more focused on her death than on her life. In doing so, he deflates a lot of the dramatic tension from her life.
The voice in the storytelling is awkward, as well. Mata Hari's letters are written in the first person, but she writes as someone aware of the infamy and iconography she will achieve after her death, which makes the voice sound more like the Coehlo's rather than the character's. This creates an awkward tension in the narration that detracts from the protagonist's telling of her story.
The Alchemist was good because the motivational message gelled with the plot being told, but in case of The Spy, the plot suffers due to the author's fetish for disbursing street wisdom in between every sentence.
Read the full story:
http://diaryofaragingbull.blogspot.com/2017/01/the-spy-by-paulo-coelho-crossing-wisdom.html