Winners Take All
Ratings16
Average rating3.7
I disagree with soooo much in this book, but it is thought-provoking.
The mot aggravating part is, I think, the lack of a clear counter-proposal to the problems he sees. It's clearly implied, of course, but he doesn't elaborate.
was buying into the screed initially. however, over successive chapters, the same surface level conspiratorial ‘globalist cabal' analysis is repeated with limited consideration of the intricacies of power reproduction. then the punchline: capital d democracy will save us all
Altered how I see change, progress, and the path forward. Though repetitive, that repetition is instructive in that it demonstrates how pervasive this “thought leadership” is among the elites and those who cater to them.
For better or worse, I see the world so much clearer today than I did when I started the book.