I was ready to DNF early on, but I trusted Octavia Butler to win me over. This time she did not.
4.4
Continuing my re-read of this series that was once a favourite.
Rebel Angels was hindered by a slow start with too much overt foreshadowing, but redeemed by the second and third acts.
I liked the expansion of the characters and settings, and enjoyed all the main plot lines, though the romance was a bit weak. The ending was very exciting and full of action.
I will definitely be finishing off the trilogy soon.
Not what I expected from “Canada's first science fiction,” but once I realized that De Mille was writing speculative fiction about recent discoveries at the time (like Antarctica and dinosaurs), I got it.
I liked the device of having a secondary plot where people are reading the story and explaining/debating the “science”.
But historical significance aside, the story is just okay.
This was a fun volume! I liked meeting Anya's classmates and watching the family dynamic evolve.
3.5
I didn't hate it, but I didn't love it either. I liked the premise, and Death's world, but most characters felt underdeveloped, and the Discworld itself felt much less alive than in other books in the series.
3.9
(I read the audiobook narrated by the author and featuring the cast of The Good Place)
As an ethics novice, How to be Perfect was a great introduction to moral philosophy.
It does a great job of explaining three branches of moral philosophy and walking you through ethical questions using the framework of those branches. It's also entertaining, funny, and easy to read.
Towards the end it touches on some other topics like intersectionalism and existentialism with less depth. This might be a shortcoming but for me it has sparked an interest in exploring these topics, and philosophy in general, further.
4.0
It's difficult and heart-breaking, and good.
Not my favourite of Butler's novels. I found the characters a little lacking, but overall it's very good.
4.8
This book is melancholy, enigmatic, and lonely in the best possible way. I read it in the original French and found it very accessible for me, for whom French is my rather rusty second language.
4.0
I knew nothing about chaos theory prior to reading Chaos. Chaos was published in 1987 when the theory was still in its infancy and a lot of what Gleick was writing about was brand new. But it's been 25 years so I feel like I didn't get a complete picture.
The book is very well researched and written, but it's a hard concept to wrap your head around and I personally still don't feel like I understand it all that well.
I'm quite interested in chaos theory now, but I feel like it would be beneficial for me to find another, more recent book that would improve my understanding and catch me up on the developments of the last 25 years.
3.75
I read this as I started self-studying for a big exam. I found a lot of the principles to be very insightful and helped me to rethink my approach to studying. That said, I think the book was a little long, and I would have preferred a bit more about the science of learning and less real-life examples.
2.5 rounded down
Men walking in the rain, trying and failing to resist various temptations, and winking at everyone like that's a normal way to greet someone.
I kept expecting more to happen, and I kept being disappointed. It's fine, just not what I was hoping for.
4.4
This was a reread of an old favourite that I was planning to donate.
I didn't think I'd even finish it, but it really surprised me, I still really enjoyed it. I love the setting, I love some of the characters, I love the magic.
I'm now looking forward to rereading the rest of the trilogy.
5.0
I picked this up after watching and loving the (much longer) adaptation on Amazon Prime.
The novel met or exceeded those high expectations. As someone who watched the series first, the setting and characters felt familiar yet different, and the story was quite different, which I appreciated.
In particular, the book version of Juliana will live with me forever.
3.6
I enjoyed the book, but I feel like there was a missed opportunity to have really great female characters. Of course this book is of a different era, and women were treated and thought of very differently than today, but it still took away from my enjoyment of the story.
Actually I think in general the characters were lacking. I'd love to find a retelling that expands on the characters all around.
3.3
The concept at the heart of the story is well executed, but otherwise this felt like an average thriller to me. It was good, but I'm not a big thriller person so I was hoping for a little more in the way of character development or great sci-fi. I feel those were done better in Recursion.
3.6 rounded down
I decided to rate this in comparison to the original short story, The Fall of the House of Usher by Edgar Allen Poe, which is a four star short story for me.
I liked the expansion of the setting and the characters, and some of the plot changes.
One creepy scene, almost halfway in, will stick with me for a long time, more than anything in the short story. I wish there had been more of that in the second half.
I feel the ending was a real departure from the original, and while I like the change in some respects, I also feel that it was like removing the heart of The Fall of the House of Usher from the story.
Merged review:
3.6 rounded down
I decided to rate this in comparison to the original short story, The Fall of the House of Usher by Edgar Allen Poe, which is a four star short story for me.
I liked the expansion of the setting and the characters, and some of the plot changes.
One creepy scene, almost halfway in, will stick with me for a long time, more than anything in the short story. I wish there had been more of that in the second half.
I feel the ending was a real departure from the original, and while I like the change in some respects, I also feel that it was like removing the heart of The Fall of the House of Usher from the story.
Low on plot, high on vibes. The vibe is eerie, mysterious, and unsettling from the get-go, and it just keeps getting weirder. At the same time, there are themes of isolation, loneliness, and lots of grief.
I don't know if I got all the metaphors, but I'm excited to look for more on re-reading.
4.8
I think this is now my favourite classic. Oscar Wilde's writing is so beautiful, and I like how the writing gradually gets darker and darker as the story progresses.
My edition also contained three shorter stories:
The Happy Prince ⭐️⭐️⭐️
The Birthday of the Infanta ⭐️⭐️⭐️
Lord Arthur Savile's Crime ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
This cozy fantasy queer romance was a delight!
(I received a digital advanced copy of this book in exchange for an honest review)
Great cast of characters, great friendships. The plot is low stakes, but still eventful and exciting. The main characters are just lovely, and I really appreciated the dual POV.
I'm not much of a romance reader, so I don't know all the tropes, but I felt like this enemies-to-lovers relationship felt natural and sweet. It isn't a spicy book by any means. It feels like we're given just enough to feel the passion and heat, while still respecting their privacy.
All my cozy fantasy needs were met. There's tea, there's cookies, there's reading and book shopping, all in a magical world with adventurers, wands, potions, and dragons. I grew to really love this city carved into a chasm, and I want to know more. Very excited for the rest of the series!
4.8
I loved the blend of science, indigenous teachings, and memoir. It's poetic, philopshical, and hopeful. My only small complaint was it sometimes felt a little repetitive and overall I think it was a little long.
The audiobook narrated by the author is great, and now I'm planning to add a physical copy to my collection.
3.4
My first Agatha Christie was Agatha Christie's first. I enjoyed it, but overall it wasn't memorable for me. I liked Poirot a lot, so I'll give the series another shot, but probably something further into her career.