Ratings1
Average rating4
When the body of a famous actress is found mutilated on an ice rink in Manchester, recreating a scene from a blockbuster film she once starred in, DI Erika Piper is put on the case-her first since suffering a near fatal attack herself, she must prove her worth. But when another body is found, the case suddenly becomes very personal.
Reviews with the most likes.
This originally appeared at The Irresponsible Reader.
---
WHAT'S A WASH OF BLACK ABOUT?
A year ago, DI Erika Piper was assaulted in the course of her duties, she survived, but it was close. It's her first day back to work, and it's a doozy.
A famous actress has been murdered and her body was essentially left on display. It's a recreation of a very famous scene from a movie she starred in—the same way her character was killed. Well, almost. The film version departed from the novel it was adapted from on a couple of points—this crime scene is loyal to the book. The publicity around this case is going to be huge—as will be the pressure to solve this quickly.
Is this a personal grudge against the actress disguised to throw off the police? Is this a crazed fan paying a gruesome tribute to the actress/movie/novel? Is this someone working off some other twisted purpose hiding it beneath the spectacle?
This killer isn't satisfied with one murder—and soon it appears the killer has Piper herself in their sights.
DI ERIKA PIPER
Piper arrives in this book nearly fully-formed, sure, there's room for development and growth in the books to come—but as a character, she's fully fleshed out. She has a past (that we get a glimpse of), well-established relationships with fellow detectives, her superiors, crime scene investigators, coroner, and so on—as well as a full personal life.
Frequently we get these layers a little at a time with a series like this, and only after a few books, do we get to see the character's entire world (or at least a good deal of it). McDonald doesn't go that route, we could be reading the 4th or 8th book in the series, not the first. I don't mind taking the former route with a character—and I understand why authors might make that choice—but I love it when an author successfully pulls off what McDonald did here.
She might be physically ready to come back to work, but she's not fully ready on the psychological front (it'd be easy to argue she never will be). I don't think she came back too soon, but she has some work to do on that front, and it was great to see a character actually do that work rather than the typical "detective does just enough to get the shrink to sign off on their return to duty."
I particularly enjoyed the relationship Piper has with DS Liam Sutton. They work so well together, and their interactions and rituals bring this part of her world to life. I'm hoping to see more of that in the books to come.
A MISTAKE OR A RED-HERRING?
I don't know about you, but I frequently find myself talking back to books when characters are making mistakes. Boy howdy, did I mutter at Piper a lot about one thing. There's a witness that I (based on my extensive training and experience as a reader of procedurals) figure should've been talked to right away. And Piper and the other detectives ignore them.
Now, was this an oversight on McDonald's part? Should Piper have tracked this person down? Is this a red herring designed to trip up readers like me?
I'm going to assume it's the latter—although it could also be a sign that Piper's a little rusty. Either way, it drove me nuts.
SO, WHAT DID I THINK ABOUT A WASH OF BLACK?
I had such a great time with A Wash of Black. It hit the spot just right—well-executed and satisfying. It's not reinventing the wheel, there's nothing revolutionary about it. It's a solid, confident police procedural that delivers all the twists and complexity that the genre demands—with a good cast of characters, an engaging protagonist, and a compelling killer. You don't need to be flashy or to subvert conventions or anything when you get everything as right as this one does.
I said it above, but it bears repeating—there's no indication that this is the first in the series—or a debut for the novelist. McDonald approaches this with the assurance of an established writer. It shouldn't need to be said, but just to be safe, I will—this is not the same kind of book as his Stonebridge Mysteries, and it takes no time at all to see that. Don't go looking for anything cozy here.
I'm eager to come back for the second, Whispers in the Dark, in a couple of weeks. In the meantime, I heartily recommend this to you.
Originally posted at irresponsiblereader.com.