Nixonland

Interestingly, Nixonland isn't a biography of Richard Nixon but instead more a history of the 1960s in America with Richard Nixon as the main character. Perlstein tells the story of the political, social, and cultural history of the U.S. in the '60s in very entertaining fashion, jumping from historical event to historical event with very satisfying in-depth analysis and exploration. Perlstein's most valuable contribution is his ability to see past the surface of historical actors' words and analyze their rhetoric and ideology with a precise clarity. Nixon becomes the perfect protagonist for such analysis because, as Perlstein makes clear, he was a master of politics and language and controlling the conversation. Nixon chose his public words very carefully, always making sure that the American public saw the version of himself (a down-to-Earth outsider who understood their frustrations, grievances, and resentments) that he wanted them to see. His actions were carefully taken as well. Nixon was able to craft coalitions with elements of the right that suited him when he needed, be they far-right John Birchers and Southern Segregationists, or moderate liberal Republicans like those who were likely to support George Romney or Nelson Rockefeller.

Perlstein believes that the present day culture wars and sociopolitical divides trace their origins to the mid 1960s and that Richard Nixon was the soothsayer who identified them first and was able to exploit them to his benefit, ultimately winning him the presidency. I do believe that the general reactionary right wing / progressive left wing cultural dispute probably is older than suggested here, but Perlstein is able to present evidence from every single part of American society (electoral politics, mass pop culture, academia, student organizing, housing, literature, military, labor) to demonstrate how this divide grew to become a great chasm in the 1960s.

great, dense history of the 60s and early 70s through the lens of nixon's rise.

perlstein did an extraordinary amount of reasearch for this book. if anything, it's perhaps a little too shaggy at times. there are a lot of events he gets into that can feel a little redundant and maybe don't add anything that's not already covered. but i understand the inclusion given that the events themselves were so remarkable.

definitely check it out if you're looking for a thorough history of the 60s/early 70s or are interested in Nixon and this era of conversatism.

It's long but I never really felt like it was just rambling on. These were crazy times that I didn't realize just how crazy it was. I knew the hippies were a thing, but I'll have to go back and re-read fear and loathing on the campaign trail ‘72. Last time I read it I remember thinking that Hunter was really such an unreliable narrator that I couldn't make head or tails of what was going on. This straight account of the wildness of the time made me realize maybe he wasn't so crazy. I mean he was, but maybe so were the things he were seeing.

Anyways, I find a bunch of parallels between Nixon and Trump and I am seriously disturbed.