Ratings9
Average rating4.3
Are we deranged? The acclaimed Indian novelist Amitav Ghosh argues that future generations may well think so. How else to explain our imaginative failure in the face of global warming? In his first major book of nonfiction since In an Antique Land, Ghosh examines our inability—at the level of literature, history, and politics—to grasp the scale and violence of climate change. The extreme nature of today’s climate events, Ghosh asserts, make them peculiarly resistant to contemporary modes of thinking and imagining. This is particularly true of serious literary fiction: hundred-year storms and freakish tornadoes simply feel too improbable for the novel; they are automatically consigned to other genres. In the writing of history, too, the climate crisis has sometimes led to gross simplifications; Ghosh shows that the history of the carbon economy is a tangled global story with many contradictory and counterintuitive elements. Ghosh ends by suggesting that politics, much like literature, has become a matter of personal moral reckoning rather than an arena of collective action. But to limit fiction and politics to individual moral adventure comes at a great cost. The climate crisis asks us to imagine other forms of human existence—a task to which fiction, Ghosh argues, is the best suited of all cultural forms. His book serves as a great writer’s summons to confront the most urgent task of our time.
Reviews with the most likes.
I believe the climate crisis is real, that it is caused by humans, and that we urgently need to change our lifestyles to prevent the destruction of the planet. It's important that I say these things explicitly and up front so that nobody interprets my dislike of this book as some sort of climate change denial.
As I was reading this book I had the strongest feeling of sitting in a boring college lecture, one inside of those big halls with stadium seating and the professor monologuing at you in the front. Well, when I get to the last page and see the acknowledgements, lo and behold, he states that the book is based on a series of lectures that he gave. Zero surprise here. None.
We are decades away from the days when bad writing was the price we paid for reading non-fiction. The author should either have stepped up and done the necessary work of turning these lectures into an engaging book, or just condensed them into a 5 minute TED Talk and left it at that.