Ratings114
Average rating3.8
The entr\hralling epic of passion and timeless enchantment.
Reviews with the most likes.
This review is not as complete as I would like, but I had to publish something here.
Ok, first of all, this book is HUGE! I should have written a review for each of the 4 parts, which are available as separate books as well. Overall it has many flaws, a few of which are major ones, specially in the last book. But I enjoyed so much that I can gladly overlook them.
The book is a retelling of the classical King Arthur story through the point of view of the women, so much that I could see how a men would take issue as how the male characters are under represented, and also how women often feel reading the typical male centered medieval fantasy stories.
However, I don't have strong opinions on the gender issue, and I try to judge a story by it's quality alone, not political correctness issues. When I read a book with a unidimensional female character, I think of her as an unidimensional female person, and if that fits well within the plot is what interests me.
Before talking about the story itself, this book is beautifully written. It could be used as a teaching aid in how to write, even by modern standards.
Anyway, this phrase has been repeated to death, what does it mean “from the point of view of the women”? Well, the women are the main focus of the story, and the book is written in a first person point of view, alternating between the protagonists. In order of importance and amount of appearance, first comes Morgaine and then Gwenhwyfar (copy and pasted this, of course). The first book is almost exclusively of Igraine, Morgaine's mother. Also throughout all the books, main roles are given to Morgause, Morgaine's aunt and Viviane, the Lady of the Lake and Morgaine's foster mother. Some minor roles are given to to Nimue, a priestess used to seduce an enemy, and Niniane, Viviane's successor.
The arthurian story, although very much present, is used as a backdrop for the lives of these women. They are fully fleshed out characters whose emotions, motivations and desires are beautifully conveyed.
Most of the myths regarding the classic tale are expressed as rational facts, adding even more to the original story. Excalibur? Forged from the metal of an meteorite, granting some of its legendary attributes, like being indestructible. Magic? Mostly explained by the interaction of wise and intelligent individuals dealing with unneducated common folk. Somethings like clever reading of another's body language in order do “divine” what they are thinking, deep understanding of human psychology in order to predict the future. Also praying on peoples false beliefs to apply some clever trick and to fool them.
The myth of King Arthur is told as an actual historical account, with real names of places, accurate dates relating events. The story is also enriched by explanations like the origin of Lancelot's name. His real name is Galahad. Which is what he calls his son. In fact, all of the knights of the round table have intrinsic relations with each other. All very well constructed.
Everything about Morgaine is nicely exposed. How she gainned her reputation as first a sorceress, then an evil one.
Nimue's plot in the last book was the weakest one, although it was still pleasantly written. The priestesses were quiet for a long time in the face of much depredation of their faith, and the case the they decided to use their powers was such an inconsequential one.
Also, the shift of attitude in Morgaine was way too sudden. Her motivation was very clear, but the way it was represented was like she woke up one day and decided to destroy Arthur.
All the incest and underage stuff sure hits harder when you know what Bradley did.
Couldn't finish this; how do you manage to make the tales surrounding King Arthur so resolutely boring? All this book seems to achieve is to confirm that the lot of women at the time was largely crap, with little control of their lives, bodies and destinies. While that might well be true, the end result is a litany of misery where nothing much happens for what feels like hundreds of pages.
I'm giving this two stars rather than one as I'll admit that it does feel like there is an interesting story under this somewhere, however I don't care enough about any of the characters to try and dig it out.
Couldn't finish. Read The Forest House by MZB some years ago, liked it. Was very jazzed to start this and quite frankly, it's boring. Arthurian legend is supposed to be anything but.
Series
7 primary books8 released booksAvalon is a 8-book series with 7 primary works first released in 1982 with contributions by Mindee Arnett, Marion Zimmer Bradley, and Diana L. Paxson.
Series
7 primary books8 released booksAvalon: Chronological Order is a 8-book series with 7 primary works first released in 1982 with contributions by Marion Zimmer Bradley, Rosemarie Hundertmarck, and Diana L. Paxson.
Series
4 primary booksLes Dames du lac is a 4-book series with 4 primary works first released in 1982 with contributions by Marion Zimmer Bradley and Diana L. Paxson.
Featured Prompt
171 booksBooks read in your formative years can shape the person you become just as much as parents, teachers and friends. What were some of the books that you remember most from your childhood years?
Featured Prompt
2,097 booksWhen you think back on every book you've ever read, what are some of your favorites? These can be from any time of your life – books that resonated with you as a kid, ones that shaped your personal...